A Review Of compromise criminal case but not fulfill pakistan case law
A Review Of compromise criminal case but not fulfill pakistan case law
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
If the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and proceed according to your law. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
The loads of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made crystal clear that police is free to just take action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities subject to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. If the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-field duties while in the interim period. Read more
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. In addition they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance facing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They can be directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Generally speaking, higher courts tend not to have direct oversight over the reduced courts of record, in that they cannot get to out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments with the lower courts.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year old boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he had experienced in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children inside the home. The boy was placed within an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted about within the foster care system.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is really a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents with the boy or girl will not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they could do if they can Slice off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who's a major, the few is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by regulation.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is very well-settled that even though thinking about the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to evaluate the merit of all the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of suitable candidates that are found to become most meritorious amongst them. Since the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked through the respondent department just to increase favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part from the respondent department.
five hundred,000/- (Rupees Five hundred thousand only) Just about every plus the same shall be saved while in the police station into the effect that no harm shall be caused into the petitioners. five. In view of the above mentioned, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair for the offender plus the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
ten. Based within the findings in the inquiry committee, this petition will not be considered maintainable and is also therefore liable being dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Criminal cases Inside the common regulation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to the case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil legislation systems, common regulation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduced courts should make decisions dependable with the previous decisions of here higher courts.